The migration moment is when compliance posture is most fragile. Aurithm tells you which controls are active, which gates must clear, what evidence will be expected, and where your gaps are — specific to your actual migration path.
A HIPAA assessment for VMware-to-AVS looks different from HIPAA for AWS-to-OCI. Different gates fire. Different evidence is required. The output is specific to your actual migration path, not a generic template.
BLOCKER gates must be resolved before migration proceeds (e.g. no BAA with target provider for ePHI). ACTION REQUIRED gates need documented plans before the affected wave starts. ADVISORY gates should be addressed but won't block cutover.
Evidence grouped by owner role (cloud architect, security architect, compliance officer) so work can be assigned directly. Each item shows freshness period and what must be confirmed.
Active controls with missing evidence generate gaps. Each gap shows severity, plain-English explanation, recommended action, and owner role.
A BAA with one provider doesn't extend to another. The CDE scope your QSA agreed to last quarter looks different on the new platform. Aurithm produces a target-aware readiness view across HIPAA (reflecting the 2026 Security Rule update — encryption and MFA now required), PCI-DSS v4.0 (treating migration as a significant-change event per Req 12.5.2), GDPR residency rules, and ISO 27001 Foundation. Every rule cites HHS guidance, PCI SSC, European Commission guidance, or vendor documentation. Auditors can verify the rules themselves.
HIPAA, PCI, GDPR, ISO — specific to your migration path. Every rule cites its authoritative source.